August 7, 2013
While in Usa River, it seemed like a good idea to stop by
the nearby horticultural research station at the village of Tengeru, aptly
named “Horti-Tengeru.” After arranging
an appointment, I was able to meet with the Director of the institute. I discovered that it was established in 1980
by the Dutch alongside the Tanzanian government. In 2010, they received a National Award for
Research in Science and Technology. As
the name indicates, they specialize in horticultural crop research and
training, including fruits, vegetables, spices, tuber crops, and mushrooms. They focus mostly on subsistence agriculture
and small/medium-scale farmers. Their
research is centered on crop husbandry (agronomy), crop protection (pathology
etc.), biotechnology (tissue culture lab), post-harvest activities, and also
seed. When I inquired more specifically
about the technologies they are advocating, he told me that they have preservation
and processing tools for value added products (e.g. solar dryers); biological
control methods and integrated pest management;
several new seed varieties (e.g. tomato from 1997) bred for high yield,
pest and disease resistance, fruit qualities (prolonged shelf life); 4 varieties
of Irish potatoes (resistant to late light and improved flavor) as well as
traditional African vegetables and improved verities for commercial production;
all are open pollinated varieties.
According to the director, OPVs are easy to maintain (i.e. farmers don’t
need a lot of scientific knowledge to cross and can reproduce their own seeds) and
the institute encourages their use. He
also noted how hybrids are good for uniformity and qualities such as early
maturation, but they require isolation and although they can be sold at a high
price, they can’t be reproduced. It is
much more common for commercial farmers to use hybrid seeds because they can
afford them and have assured markets.
When I asked about GMOs, the director said that “we can still use the verities
we have if we adopt the best crop production methods – we need to maximize the
use of technologies (e.g. fertilizers and pesticides.” Horti-Tengeru, however, trains farmers on
integrated pest and crop management (IPM), especially as farmers become more
aware of the risks of using chemicals.
However, he also said, “Pesticides are an integral part of pest management
when used safely.” To him, organic is
“okay” and a safe way to produce corps, but he isn’t sure about the yield as
compared to conventional. Another
potentially sketchy statement: “there is no land shortage in the country – only
6-10% of the arable land is cultivated.
Land is vast but it depends on how we use it.” He pointed to constructing buildings on
fertile land as total mismanagement.
Though of course there is tension between wild life conservation,
pastoralists, and farmers. On land
grabbing: “we need limits. We need our
own plans before we left investors in and land grabbing will bring problems in
the future because if you have the money, you can grab the land.” He talked about a current land crisis going
on in Arusha region between large farmers (foreign-owned plantations, often
flowers) and local farmers in which the authorities are trying to intervene
(apparently unsuccessfully?). As I have
been doing with many of my interviewees, I asked him about best practices: crop
rotation, timed planting, good irrigation (recommend drip but is an issue with
poor farmers, also hand pumps and water harvesting techniques), use of improved
seed varieties, IPM, post-harvest preservation, and marketing (value chain
approach from seed to plate). In terms
of climate change, it seems that all we can do is “use the little water we have
more efficiently” (i.e. drip irrigation) and in terms of mitigation and
adaptation, “breed for moisture stress, insect and disease resistance, crops
that can survive in harsh environments (acidic, saline, etc.).” Farmers are also encouraged to plant trees
and reduce deforestation. Horti-Tengeru
also trains farmers in the “safe use” of synthetic pesticides, as well as
biopesticides, though small-scale farmers are usually intercropping, which can
be a form of risk aversion against pests and disease, while large farmers are
specializing (sisal, maize, flowers) and for commercial farming, again it is
not in their interest to intercrop for efficiency purposes. And our dialogue ended with me posing the
question of how, in his opinion, are we going to feed the world’s growing
population? His response was something
to the effect of: “a combination of small and large farmers. But small farmers in Tanzanian have provided
for urban dwellers in the past. And
through improved agricultural technologies, small farmers can meet this
demand. Kikwete [the current president
of Tanzanian] is supporting this – Kilimo Kwanza [national agriculture policy
that translates to “Agriculture First”] since more than 80% of the population
relies on agriculture for their livelihood.
Kilimo is the backbone of our economy, raw materials, and our own food –
it needs investment.” The director
seemed hopeful about the future of farming in Tanzania. I finished my visit with a tour of the
premises: the green houses, the banana demonstration/experimentation plot, and
some of the scientific equipment (which seemed light years ahead of the
equipment at ARI-Mlingano in Tanga, which is interesting since they are both
government supported). Today was also
the day that I rode a boda boda (also known as piki piki or motorcycle) in
Tanzania for the first time. Actually it
was my first motorcycle ride ever and helmetless to-boot (helmets are somewhat
hard to come by in this country). I got
sort of lost trying to find the institute and it was much farther from the road
than I had initially anticipated, so I was really left with no other options. I am ashamed to say that following this
stint, riding boda bodas became kind of a regular occurrence. Each time I told myself, this is the last
time! And I would try to ask the drivers
if I could wear their helmets. But
something about having the wind in your hair and zooming through traffic is
exhilarating. Though each time, I hang
on for dear life and say “pole, pole,” (slow, slow). And as one person I met here put it: “riding
a boda boda is like committing suicide.”
Hmm, well good thing I made it out of Tanzania OK.
After half a day at Horti-Tengeru, I finally made a visit to
a nearby NGO called TAN-EDAPS (Tanzanian Environmental Development and Animal
Power Society) and met with the founder/executive director. TAN-EDAPS is
conveniently located in the village in which I'm living (Maji Ya Chai), and
their website provides useful background information on agriculture in the
area, which I will share:
First off, Tanzania has a population of about 40 million,
80% of which is involved in agriculture, and is a democratic nation that
actively stands against corruption (though I have heard otherwise from most
people I've talked to). The Maji ya Chai
area has "deep volcanic soils" that are extremely fertile, though
still susceptible to drought (and most farmers do not have access to irrigation
methods). The farmers are small-scale,
mainly cultivating cassava, maize, bananas, coffee and sunflowers, with some
animal husbandry of poultry, cattle, and goats.
For the more fortunate, they plough with oxen and transport using
donkey, and even though farmers are producing cash crops, they generate very
little surplus income and struggle to pay school fees for their children and
even purchasing seeds for the next season.
HIV/AIDs is also a force that cannot be ignored. So what is TAN-EDAPS doing? They emphasis environmental sustainability
and "using draft animals in an efficient and humane way." They work at the grassroots/village level
upwards and promote community mobilization and sensitization. They have projects in: environment and food
security, education and early childhood development, water and sanitation,
integrated health, economic empowerment, women's and children's rights, and
good governance and leadership. They
emphasize the importance of forming Community Economic Development Groups
(CEDGs), with about 20 men and women who work to assess their own strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT).
I am most interested in the environment and food security projects,
which involve small-scale livestock use, biointensive (organic) agriculture
practices, tree planting and bee keeping, and the use of appropriate technology
for compatibility and environmental conservation. These technologies include: solar power, zero
grazing, domestic biogas extraction, local stoves, recycling solid waste, and
draft animal technology schemes. They
also promote rainwater harvesting, digging shallow wells, and collaborating
with other stakeholders to dig deep wells, build holding tanks, lay piping, and
acquiring pumps (all of which are expensive, hence the need for partnerships).
After meeting with the founder/director, it was easy to see
how passionate and committed he is, albeit short of resources. He invited me into his modest office, offered
me sodas, tea, cookies, and white rolls.
A religious man, he kept insisting that God had ensured our meeting
(which we had to unfortunately reschedule four times). I learned that TAN-EDAPS is working with
farmer groups in Tanga, Manyara, and mostly Arusha (establishing community
development groups in 10 villages).
Somehow we started off talking about development and he said, “The World
Bank and the IMF are good; they have good plans, but only when resources are
available and they make it to the target group/reach the utilization
point. Follow up is key and usually the
case. There is a group of people in
between the organizations and the needy who are corrupt and benefitting. So it is good in theory but difficult in
practice because at the government/ministry and international level, things
appear fine, but at the district level, many resources do not reach the
farmers, indigenous groups, and grassroots organizations. More evidence of corruption,” he sighed. Now they are working on advocacy and training
groups at the grassroots level so they can know their rights and how to follow
up with all levels of government.
TAN-EDAPS vision is “improved quality of lives among Tanzanian
communities living in a well conserved environment in a sustainable manner.” His community entry process or way to
identify groups by going into churches, knocking on doors in communities, going
through the government, and attending village meetings. Through his work with World Vision, the
Tanzanian government, and now TAN-EDAPS, the director has helped facilitated
more than 100 farmer groups, with an ongoing emphasis on sustainable
development at the household level: “our development groups are effective
community based organizations where transformational development is holistic
and sustainable,” which he said becomes evident through higher employment
levels, increased nutrition, improved environment, a new culture of respect
etc. After a group has agreed to come
together (ideally 20-30 people in order to optimize the benefit on both ends
and for maximum utilization of resources), he holds a strategic planning
training. I wasn’t expecting it, but in
the 3-4 hours we spent in his office, he gave me a mini lesson in strategic
planning. This is roughly what it looks
like:
·
Day 1: help the group establish their own vision
related to people and the environment through a baseline survey; facilitate
their identification through needs assessment and goal prioritization matrix
(voting) (since governments and donors are pouring so much money into the
system without properly identifying and prioritizing issues, which fosters
increased corruption and misappropriation)
·
Day 2: enable the group to conduct their own
SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, sustainability)
·
Day 3: facilitate people to develop an annual
plan in a log frame manner (a good tool for monitoring and evaluation)
·
Day 4: educate people and empower them in the
areas of: management and good governance; finance (handing funds, budgeting,
banking); relationships and networking (especially self-introduction);
technical aspects for effective program ownership and sustainability
·
Day 5: introduce modern and appropriate
technologies for projects that are compatible with conservation of the existing
ecosystem (e.g. solar power, biogas, improved local stoves, biointensive
agriculture, animal power)
·
Day 6: train on how to initiate and promote savings
and credit cooperative societies (SACCOS) and teach them how to pool their own
resources (so they can borrow money from themselves with interest and qualify
for microcredit loans)
An example of an actual strategic plan from Meru district:
Priorities:
2. Good livestock keeping (milk cows, goats, chickens, pigs, donkeys, stingless bee keeping)
3. Education of groups (leadership and good governance, finance, project planning, entrepreneurship (small business and marketing), and acquiring and utilizing monetary resources)
4. Environmental conservation (tree planting for fruits, firewood and shade; clean environment free of garbage; use of appropriate technologies such as renewable energy; and conservation of water)
5. Reaching and helping vulnerable groups (children, widows, orphans, sick, elderly
6. Technical issue training (sewing, home crafts, carpentry, cookery, masonry, electricity)
7. Business (marketing, networking and using the Internet)
8. Appropriate technology (Teknolojia rahisi in Swahili: recycling of waste products, solar power, biogas, organic agriculture)
9. SACCOS and microfinance
10.
Reach and help pregnant mothers in harsh
environments
I learned that group leaders are required to attend an
annual general assembly meeting to follow up and reassess their strategic
plans. In addition to these, TAN-EDAPS
has project areas and of course I was most interested in food security, which
refers to “Food availability, accessibility, utilization and asset
creation.” Availability refers to the
possibility of locally acquiring, growing, harvesting one’s own food each
year. Accessibility is the
infrastructure (e.g. a lack of quality roads impairs the distribution of
government food reserves). Utilization
is eating and also proper nutritional education. Lastly, asset creation is entrepreneurship
and value added products. He emphasized
the connection between food security and early childhood development, as well
as economic empowerment at the family and group levels. TAN-EDAPS advocates biointensive agriculture
and they have a learning center and demonstration plot (which unfortunately I
was unable to visit due to time constraints). He wants to make follow up o the
groups but because of the lack of resources, he cannot visit them. In total, he has 2-3,000 beneficiaries in
Meru district but the main bottleneck is of course funds. He is brainstorming ways to promote financial
independence from donors: a recycling program and avocado sales for export are
among his ideas. In terms of
biointensive agriculture, his training practices include: preparing double dug
beds with compost, companion planting, local biopesticides, proper plant
spacing and mulching. However, he noted
that it is challenging to convince farmers to shift from conventional to
organic because the preparation is time consuming and there are limitations on
land area. He said, “scaling up organic
to commercial is possible if you plan properly and know the market competition
and customers. Scaling up and exporting
abroad is a good solution.” The avocado
project he talked about would involve planting at least 500 trees and this
would help mitigate climate change. He
said it can help boost nutrition at home, generate income and then have a
trickledown effect to allow for the purchase of solar power and improved
stoves. He acknowledges that exporting
abroad will add to climate change through carbon emissions but that “we need to
balance.” I asked where farmers get
their seeds and he said local agrovet shops, but his future hope is for farmers
to save and reproduce their own seeds.
In terms of animal power, he said that land shortages only occur in some
places, so animal power is still viable in many regions. But because they don’t have proper harnessing
equipment for donkeys, the most common draft animal, issues of humane treatment
arise. On average, farmers in the area
have 2 donkeys and 2-5 acres per household.
They are using mostly hand tools with some oxen plowing. Farmers need 40-50,000 tsh (~$30 usd) to hire
a tractor plough an acre per season and he encourages them to pool their
resources to purchase and share a power tiller or tractor. “We need tractors, it will solve the whole village
problem,” he said, which again seemed a bit counter intuitive to his whole
mission of promoting animal power. Speaking
of animals, farmers use livestock for their meat, milk, sales and home
consumption and tend to prefer Friesian, Asian and jersey cow breeds (all
exotic). He has partnered with the
Heifer Project in the past in distributing livestock. Regarding irrigation, some people have piped
water, but apparently the government technically forbids irrigation because of
water shortages. Except he acknowledged
the Uwamale project, which is donor funded and the only large-scale irrigation
project in the district. Farmers are
also trained to dig shallow wells (12-20 m), but again need money to purchase
pumps. Rainwater harvesting is ideal but
right now this only occurs at dispensaries and churches. I asked about yield and he said that in one
season, farmers can typically get 5 bags of maize (500 kg) per acre, while
their goal was 15 bags per acre. “The
problem is lack of agricultural knowledge and inability to purchase good seeds,
manure, and fertilizers. For three years
you can produce well conventionally but after that, the land is barren.” As a result, he believes that biointensive is
required for human health and land/environmental conservation.
No comments:
Post a Comment